Recovered from the drowned archives of the Sapphire Sanctum. Author unknown.
The following was transcribed by hand in aquan script, but rendered here in the common tongue for clarity. It is believed to be a firsthand record of a communion with the ancient water elemental sovereign, Alun’Zharath. The binding ritual required a sealed chamber, a heart of coral, and a breath held for three tides. The account bears signs of water damage and salt crystallization, but the central passage remains intact.
He came.
The waters turned glass. The pressure bore down as if the sea itself had come to listen.
From the black pool rose a figure, tall and robed in undulating tides. No eyes. No mouth. But his voice crushed thought and breath all the same. He spoke not with words, but with memory—as though the sea itself had not forgotten what the world above tried to bury.
These are the words I remember. They echo still.
“You ask of the Flame That Drowned. Yes. I knew him. We all did. Every tide remembers his heat. He was certainty set ablaze.”
He did not speak in anger. There was no rage. Only depth. And sorrow.
“He boiled the rain before it fell. Turned cloud to cinder. Evaporated the screams of a thousand rivers. And yet… he did not hate. He merely was. And believed that was enough.”
I dared to ask what stopped him. The air thinned when I did.
“We rose—air, stone, and sea alike. But none could quench him. Not truly. We would have shattered the world trying.”
“Then She came. The Mother. The Divider. The Silence Between Flames.”
“She did not strike him down. She broke his name. And cast him into breath and blood, Into snow and soil.”
“He walks still. But small. Muzzled. Mortal.”
“He does not know what he was. But the sea remembers. And the sea waits.”
There was a silence after this—one that lingered even when the waters receded. And then, one final whisper, spoken in tremors down the spine:
“Tell him: The sea forgives what flame forgets. But not forever.”
I believe the elemental was speaking not only of fire… but of fate.
The record ends abruptly. The final few lines of the manuscript are warped by salt bloom and unreadable.
Annotation by Archivist Tellen Vorin, Keeper of the Deep Flame and Adjunct Scholar of Elemental Lore regarding the text known as “Transcript of the Brine-Soul’s Witness“.
This document is one of the most intriguing surviving accounts related to the supposed fall and transformation of an unnamed Fire Sovereign, often referred to in oral tradition as the Flame That Drowned. While clearly rooted in Water Corner theology, the tone of the transcript is notably reverent—even mournful—rather than condemning, which is rare among elemental testimonies of the Sundering Era.
Several key points are worth scholarly attention:
-
The description of the flame-born being as “certainty set ablaze” may reflect the elemental dogma of essence-driven behavior—that is, the idea that elementals act not from will, but from their inherent nature. The implication that this being believed it was enough may support theories that it transcended elemental instinct, reaching the threshold of divinity or identity.
-
The passage “She broke his name” is profoundly significant. Names hold power among elementals, especially those of lord rank. To break a name suggests an intentional fragmentation of essence and memory—possibly aligning with ancient rites of mortal binding or enforced reincarnation. This is one of the strongest pieces of textual evidence for a ritual transformation enacted by Namas herself.
-
The final whisper—“Tell him: the sea forgives what flame forgets. But not forever.”—has generated much speculation. Some interpret it as a prophecy of return, others as a warning that memory itself is a force beyond the gods. There are unverified reports of druids or element-touched mortals in far reaches exhibiting anomalous affinity with fire, which some believe may be connected.
It is worth noting that the ritual described to summon Alun’Zharath has not been successfully replicated in recorded history, despite claims by at least two Water Corner factions and a handful of rogue Flame scholars. Whether this account represents a singular communion, a mythic dramatization, or a fragment of collective elemental memory, it continues to hold a central place in theological debates on redemption, balance, and the mutability of elemental essence.
Further research is needed. The Assembly has deemed the document moderately restricted due to the risk of misinterpretation by lay initiates.
—Archivist Tellen Vorin,
Year 19 of the Concordance
Filed under: Testimonia Elementara Obscura – Section III: Transitional Essence